Bank of New York Mellon v. Thompson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bank of New York Mellon v. Thompson

230 So. 3d 638

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 8, 2017

DocketCase 5D16-3372

StatusPublished

This text of 230 So. 3d 638 (Bank of New York Mellon v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of New York Mellon v. Thompson, 230 So. 3d 638 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the lower court’s order that involuntarily dismissed its foreclosure case against Appellees. The lower court concluded that Appellant failed to establish its standing to foreclose and the superiority of its lien. We reverse.

Appellant is correct that the lower court erred in its conclusion regarding standing. See Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Milford, 206 So.3d 137, 137-38 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (reversing order involuntarily dismissing foreclosure case for lack of standing where bank filed copy of note indorsed in blank with complaint and offered original note into evidence at trial; this evidence created inference that bank was in possession of note at time it filed complaint and, without evidence to contrary, this was sufficient to establish standing); U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Laird, 200 So.3d 176, 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (bank had standing to foreclosure where it attached to complaint copy of note and copy of allonge, which contained specific indorsement in favor of bank, and it later filed with court original note and allonge in same condition as copies attached to complaint).

We also agree that the lower court ei*red by dismissing the action for the failure of Appellant to allege or prove superiority of its lien. See Black Point Assets, Inc. v. Fed. Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n, 220 So.3d 566 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017); see also Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Luciano Del Lupo, 208 So.3d 97, 97-98 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (reversing involuntary dismissal and remanding for new-trial where plaintiff presented prima facie evidence of each element of foreclosure case).

REVERSED AND REMANDED for a new trial.

TORPY, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the lower court’s order that involuntarily dismissed its foreclosure case against Appellees. The lower court concluded that Appellant failed to establish its standing to foreclose and the superiority of its lien. We reverse.

Appellant is correct that the lower court erred in its conclusion regarding standing. See Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Milford, 206 So.3d 137, 137-38 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (reversing order involuntarily dismissing foreclosure case for lack of standing where bank filed copy of note indorsed in blank with complaint and offered original note into evidence at trial; this evidence created inference that bank was in possession of note at time it filed complaint and, without evidence to contrary, this was sufficient to establish standing); U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Laird, 200 So.3d 176, 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (bank had standing to foreclosure where it attached to complaint copy of note and copy of allonge, which contained specific indorsement in favor of bank, and it later filed with court original note and allonge in same condition as copies attached to complaint).

We also agree that the lower court ei*red by dismissing the action for the failure of Appellant to allege or prove superiority of its lien. See Black Point Assets, Inc. v. Fed. Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n, 220 So.3d 566 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017); see also Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Luciano Del Lupo, 208 So.3d 97, 97-98 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (reversing involuntary dismissal and remanding for new-trial where plaintiff presented prima facie evidence of each element of foreclosure case).

REVERSED AND REMANDED for a new trial.

TORPY, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 So. 3d 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-new-york-mellon-v-thompson-fladistctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack