Bank of New York Mellon v. Pogonovich, K.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, : No. 147 WAL 2018 F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS : TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF : EQCC ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES, : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from SERIES 2001-1F, : the Order of the Superior Court : Respondents : : : v. : : : KARL M. POGONOVICH, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issues rephrased for clarity are:
(1) Did the Superior Court depart from accepted judicial practices or abuse its discretion in finding as fact that Petitioner admitted to being personally served with the complaint in mortgage foreclosure?
(2) Did the Superior Court depart from accepted judicial practices or abuse its discretion in concluding as a matter of law that Petitioner had been served with original process with the underlying foreclosure complaint?
Justice Baer did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bank of New York Mellon v. Pogonovich, K. (Bank of New York Mellon v. Pogonovich, K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.