Bank of New York Mellon v. Hayes

394 S.W.3d 443, 2013 WL 601130, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 209
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 19, 2013·No. No. ED 98284·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Byron Hayes, appeals pro se from an adverse judgment in an action seeking foreclosure and other relief. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of New York Mellon v. Hayes, 394 S.W.3d 443, 2013 WL 601130, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 209 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

394 S.W.3d 443 (Bank of New York Mellon v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)