Bank of New York Mellon v. Garrett

2016 NY Slip Op 7155, 144 A.D.3d 621, 39 N.Y.S.3d 829
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 2, 2016
Docket2014-04557
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2016 NY Slip Op 7155 (Bank of New York Mellon v. Garrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of New York Mellon v. Garrett, 2016 NY Slip Op 7155, 144 A.D.3d 621, 39 N.Y.S.3d 829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Jennifer Garrett appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated October 2, 2013, which denied those branches of her motion which were for leave to reargue and renew her opposition to that branch of the plaintiff’s prior motion which was for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the motion which was for leave to reargue is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

The plaintiff commenced this action to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendants Jennifer Garrett and Marvin Bracey against their residential property located in Chester, New York.

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of Garrett’s motion which was for leave to renew her opposition to that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against her. A motion for leave to renew must be based, as is relevant here, on “new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination” (CPLR 2221 [e]). Here, the new facts offered by Garrett would not have changed the prior determination.

The parties’ remaining contentions are either not properly before this Court or without merit.

Rivera, J.R, Austin, Sgroi and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phoenix Grantor Trust v. Exclusive Hospitality, LLC
2019 NY Slip Op 3637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
41st Rd. Props., LLC v. Wang Real Prop., LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 5565 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Gall v. Colon-Sylvain
2017 NY Slip Op 4425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 NY Slip Op 7155, 144 A.D.3d 621, 39 N.Y.S.3d 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-new-york-mellon-v-garrett-nyappdiv-2016.