Bank of New York Mellon v. Baloun

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bank of New York Mellon v. Baloun

200 So. 3d 148, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8057, 2016 WL 3031956

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 27, 2016

Docket5D14-4470

StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 3d 148 (Bank of New York Mellon v. Baloun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of New York Mellon v. Baloun, 200 So. 3d 148, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8057, 2016 WL 3031956 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Bank of New York Mellon appeals from the order dismissing its foreclosure action against Jeffrey S. Baloun and Sara Ross Hardy-Baloun on the grounds that the default letter did not comply with the notice requirement set forth in paragraphs 20 and 22 of the mortgage. Because Bank’s letter substantially complied with its notice obligations under the mortgage, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Johnson, 185 So.3d 594, 597 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016); Diaz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 189 So.3d 279 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016); Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Milam, 177 So.3d 7, 14-15 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); Bank of America v. Cadet, 183 So.3d 477, 478 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Suntrust Mortg., Inc. v. Garcia, 186 So.3d 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BERGER, WALLIS, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Bank of New York Mellon appeals from the order dismissing its foreclosure action against Jeffrey S. Baloun and Sara Ross Hardy-Baloun on the grounds that the default letter did not comply with the notice requirement set forth in paragraphs 20 and 22 of the mortgage. Because Bank’s letter substantially complied with its notice obligations under the mortgage, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Johnson, 185 So.3d 594, 597 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016); Diaz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 189 So.3d 279 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016); Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Milam, 177 So.3d 7, 14-15 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); Bank of America v. Cadet, 183 So.3d 477, 478 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Suntrust Mortg., Inc. v. Garcia, 186 So.3d 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BERGER, WALLIS, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 So. 3d 148, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8057, 2016 WL 3031956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-new-york-mellon-v-baloun-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack