Bank of New York Mellon Trustee v. Nagachandra

Fourth Circuit

Bank of New York Mellon Trustee v. Nagachandra

622 F. App'x 268

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 19, 2015

DocketNo. 15-1930

StatusPublished

This text of 622 F. App'x 268 (Bank of New York Mellon Trustee v. Nagachandra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of New York Mellon Trustee v. Nagachandra, 622 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nagaraj Nagachandra appeals the district court’s order dismissing the case with prejudice after finding the notice of removal improper. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bank of New York Mellon Trustee v. Nagachandra Nagaraj, No. 8:15-cv-01171-PJM (D.Md. Aug. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nagaraj Nagachandra appeals the district court’s order dismissing the case with prejudice after finding the notice of removal improper. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bank of New York Mellon Trustee v. Nagachandra Nagaraj, No. 8:15-cv-01171-PJM (D.Md. Aug. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

622 F. App'x 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-new-york-mellon-trustee-v-nagachandra-ca4-2015.