Bank of New York Financial Corp. v. Mitchell-B.J. Ltd.
This text of 222 A.D.2d 217 (Bank of New York Financial Corp. v. Mitchell-B.J. Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered August 1, 1995, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on Statute of Limitations grounds, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff commenced an action in January 1995, against Helen Winje, a notary public, and her employer, Extebank, alleging that on February 13, 1991, Ms. Winje acknowledged the signature of defendant Henriette Shidlofsky on a joint guaranty of a factoring agreement, when in fact Ms. Shidlofsky was not the person who signed that document. Executive Law § 135 provides no limitations period for an action commenced pursuant to its provisions, and neither the CPLR nor any other statute specifically prescribes a limitations period for notarial misconduct. Therefore, CPLR 213 (1), which provides that "an action for which no limitation is specifically prescribed by law” must be commenced within six years, applies to the instant claim and the IAS Court properly denied the motion to dismiss. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 A.D.2d 217, 634 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-new-york-financial-corp-v-mitchell-bj-ltd-nyappdiv-1995.