Bank of New York and Trust Company v. Hamersley
148 N.E. 704, 240 N.Y. 558, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 776
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs to each party or set of parties appearing by attorney payable out of the estate; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Absent: McLaughlin, J.-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bank of New York and Trust Company v. Hamersley, 148 N.E. 704, 240 N.Y. 558, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 776 (N.Y. 1925).
148 N.E. 704 (Bank of New York and Trust Company v. Hamersley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Parkinson
138 Misc. 2d 1069 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1988)
In re the Estate of Boddy
136 Misc. 2d 87 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1987)
Bamberger v. Morris
144 Misc. 4 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
In re the Estate of Surpless
143 Misc. 48 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1932)
In re the Estate of Thomas
133 Misc. 601 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1929)