Bank of Montreal v. Predovan

New York Court of Appeals

Bank of Montreal v. Predovan

522 N.E.2d 1055, 71 N.Y.2d 844, 527 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 1242

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 22, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 522 N.E.2d 1055 (Bank of Montreal v. Predovan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of Montreal v. Predovan, 522 N.E.2d 1055, 71 N.Y.2d 844, 527 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 1242 (N.Y. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the order of the Appellate Division as affirmed the order of the Supreme Court denying defendant Janeo Predovan’s motion to vacate that court’s judgment, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the order of the Appellate Division as affirmed the order and judgment of Supreme Court, dismissed upon the ground that an appeal does not lie from a default judgment entered upon an uncontested inquest (CPLR 5511). Motion insofar as it seeks a stay and poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the order of the Appellate Division as affirmed the order of the Supreme Court denying defendant Janeo Predovan’s motion to vacate that court’s judgment, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the order of the Appellate Division as affirmed the order and judgment of Supreme Court, dismissed upon the ground that an appeal does not lie from a default judgment entered upon an uncontested inquest (CPLR 5511). Motion insofar as it seeks a stay and poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

522 N.E.2d 1055, 71 N.Y.2d 844, 527 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 1242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-montreal-v-predovan-ny-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack