Bank of Montreal v. Charles R. Lawliss & Associates, Ltd.
366 A.2d 534, 134 Vt. 622, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 853
Opinion
Because permission to appeal under 12 V.S.A. § 4601 was not obtained, the motion to dismiss is granted. Webster v. LaDuke, 126 Vt. 27, 220 A.2d 474 (1966).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bank of Montreal v. Charles R. Lawliss & Associates, Ltd., 366 A.2d 534, 134 Vt. 622, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 853 (Vt. 1976).
366 A.2d 534 (Bank of Montreal v. Charles R. Lawliss & Associates, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Webster Ex Rel. Estate of LaDuke v. LaDuke
220 A.2d 474 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1966)