Bank of Montpelier v. Russell

27 Vt. 719
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided April 15, 1855·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the court, Redfield, Ch. J.

The only question raised in the present case is in regard to the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ declaration, upon general demurrer. It is in a brief form, which has been in very general use in the state, for many years, and always regarded, by this court as sufficient, in the ordinary case of natural persons being parties to the suit. An attempt is made to show that the plaintiff is not properly described, but we see no difficulty upon that ground.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of Montpelier v. Russell, 27 Vt. 719 (Vt. 1855).

27 Vt. 719 (Bank of Montpelier v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Friend v. Pitman
42 A. 317 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1898)