Bank of Montpelier v. Russell
27 Vt. 719
Opinion
The only question raised in the present case is in regard to the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ declaration, upon general demurrer. It is in a brief form, which has been in very general use in the state, for many years, and always regarded, by this court as sufficient, in the ordinary case of natural persons being parties to the suit. An attempt is made to show that the plaintiff is not properly described, but we see no difficulty upon that ground.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bank of Montpelier v. Russell, 27 Vt. 719 (Vt. 1855).
27 Vt. 719 (Bank of Montpelier v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Friend v. Pitman
42 A. 317 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1898)