Bank of Monett v. Moulder

43 Mo. App. 279, 1891 Mo. App. LEXIS 26
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bank of Monett v. Moulder. Read the opinion of the Court — 53 Mo. App. 535
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 6, 1891·Published

Opinion

Rombauer, P. J.

The plaintiff recovered judgment, June 5, 1890, and the defendant appealed to this court on the following day. No transcript of the record was filed in this court until September 29, following, which was less than fifteen days before the beginning of the term to which the appeal was returnable. The respondent moves for an affirmance of the judgment because the transcript was not filed within the time required by law. Affidavits are filed in opposition to the motion, which show, as sole cause for the delay, that the appellant left the state shortly after the trial, and •failed to provide his attorneys with funds to pay for the transcript. This shows no diligence on part of appellant. One who takes an appeal must make timely provisions for its prosecution. Smith v. Merrill, 26 Mo. App. 65.

The judgment is affirmed.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of Monett v. Moulder, 43 Mo. App. 279, 1891 Mo. App. LEXIS 26 (Mo. Ct. App. 1891).

43 Mo. App. 279 (Bank of Monett v. Moulder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Merrill
26 Mo. App. 65 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)