Bank of Midville v. Gordy
This text of 163 S.E.2d 711 (Bank of Midville v. Gordy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The actual relief sought is to enjoin the sale of land under the power of sale in the security deed thereto, the petition alleging that the life insurance on the deceased borrower should have paid off the note. We do not agree with the appellant that it is a suit against the insurance company and involves personalty belonging to the estate of the deceased. But this construction does not add strength to the plaintiff’s claim as against the motion to dismiss on the ground no claim for relief is shown. However, examination of the evidence submitted at the interlocutory hearing discloses no grounds whatever for the granting of a temporary injunction. The bank collected a credit life insurance premium, yet the insurance agent refused to accept the premium because he had actual knowledge of the terminal illness of the borrower, and her account was immediately credited by the bank with the amount of the premium. There was no insurance as alleged in the pleadings, and the debt being past due and unpaid, there was no evidence to support the grant of the injunctive relief. For a somewhat similar case see Christian v. Carrollton Fed. Savings &c. Assn., 221 Ga. 119 (143 SE2d 391).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 S.E.2d 711, 224 Ga. 615, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-midville-v-gordy-ga-1968.