Bank of Metropolis v. Walker
2 D.C. 361
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedOctober 15, 1822
StatusPublished
This text of 2 D.C. 361 (Bank of Metropolis v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bank of Metropolis v. Walker, 2 D.C. 361 (circtddc 1822).
Opinion
discharged the rule, being of opinion that the judgment did not relate back to the verdict; no argument having been had upon the ease stated, nor had it been submitted to the Court before the cause was continued, by consent, from October term, 1821, to April term, 1822. It was not continued under cur. ad. vult.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 D.C. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-metropolis-v-walker-circtddc-1822.