Bank of Madison v. Cochran

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bank of Madison v. Cochran

105 S.E. 626, 26 Ga. App. 125, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 16

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 20, 1921

Docket11463

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 105 S.E. 626 (Bank of Madison v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of Madison v. Cochran, 105 S.E. 626, 26 Ga. App. 125, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 16 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. Where one purporting to be the maker of a promissory note • negotiates it, for a money consideration, with the payee named therein, the note will be considered as the act and deed of the alleged maker, although he did not in fact sign the note. Under such evidence a plea of non est factum is not sustained.

2. There being no conflict in the evidence upon the controlling question in this ease, the judge of the trial court erred in sustaining the certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., amd Hill, J., concur.

Certiorari; from Putnam superior court — Judge Park. March 17, 1920.

M. G. Few, for plaintiff. R. G. Jenlcins, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI