Bank of Luverne v. Reddoch

Supreme Court of Alabama

Bank of Luverne v. Reddoch

100 So. 922, 211 Ala. 699

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMay 22, 1924

Docket4 Div. 94.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 So. 922 (Bank of Luverne v. Reddoch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of Luverne v. Reddoch, 100 So. 922, 211 Ala. 699 (Ala. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the second appeal in this case, and the decree from which this appeal was taken conformed to the opinion of the court. 207 Ala. 297, 92 South. 848, 25 A. L. R. 381. This appeal, therefore, involves the soundness of said opinion, and is in the nature of a second application for rehearing. The former appeal was carefully considered by the section of the court then sitting on the original hearing and upon rehearing and has been duly considered' by the other section, before whom the second appeal was argued, and while we are not unmindful of section 5965 of the Code, providing that the former opinion must not be regarded as conclusive, we think that the same is sound and adhere thereto. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is the second appeal in this case, and the decree from which this appeal was taken conformed to the opinion of the court. 207 Ala. 297, 92 South. 848, 25 A. L. R. 381. This appeal, therefore, involves the soundness of said opinion, and is in the nature of a second application for rehearing. The former appeal was carefully considered by the section of the court then sitting on the original hearing and upon rehearing and has been duly considered' by the other section, before whom the second appeal was argued, and while we are not unmindful of section 5965 of the Code, providing that the former opinion must not be regarded as conclusive, we think that the same is sound and adhere thereto. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 So. 922, 211 Ala. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-luverne-v-reddoch-ala-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack