Bank of Laurel Hill v. Pryor

Supreme Court of Florida

Bank of Laurel Hill v. Pryor

114 So. 784, 94 Fla. 992

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 2, 1927·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered,^rdered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree'of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered,^rdered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree'of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Bank of Laurel Hill v. Pryor, 114 So. 784, 94 Fla. 992 (Fla. 1927).

Pincite

114 So. 784 (Bank of Laurel Hill v. Pryor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.