Bank of Lauderdale v. Cole

Mississippi Supreme Court

Bank of Lauderdale v. Cole

64 So. 214, 106 Miss. 496

DecidedOctober 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 64 So. 214 (Bank of Lauderdale v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of Lauderdale v. Cole, 64 So. 214, 106 Miss. 496 (Mich. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Tbe filing of an appeal bond within two years after tbe rendition of a judgment or a decree appealed from stops tbe running of tbe statute limiting tbe time within which appeals may be taken, although no citation was served. McAlister v. Richardson, 57 So. 547. There is no merit, therefore, in appellee’s contention that tbe appeal in this case is barred; and this being tbe only objection to tbe relief prayed for, the appellants will be granted sixty days within which to perfect tbe record.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, C. J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Tbe filing of an appeal bond within two years after tbe rendition of a judgment or a decree appealed from stops tbe running of tbe statute limiting tbe time within which appeals may be taken, although no citation was served. McAlister v. Richardson, 57 So. 547. There is no merit, therefore, in appellee’s contention that tbe appeal in this case is barred; and this being tbe only objection to tbe relief prayed for, the appellants will be granted sixty days within which to perfect tbe record.

Remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 So. 214, 106 Miss. 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-lauderdale-v-cole-miss-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack