Bank of Kentucky v. Todd
This text of 8 Ky. 157 (Bank of Kentucky v. Todd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
We are of opinion the circuit court erred in permitting the letters writen by a clerk in the bank to one of the defendants, to be read as evidence against the bank.
These letters were clearly extra-official, and not having [158]*158been writen by the orders or direction of the bank, cannot, on anJ principle, be considered as admissible evidence. ⅛
The judgment must, therefore, be reversed with'costs, anc^ ^le cause be remanded, that a new trial may be. had not inconsistent with the foregoing opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ky. 157, 1 A.K. Marsh. 157, 1818 Ky. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-kentucky-v-todd-kyctapp-1818.