Bank of Kentucky v. Todd

8 Ky. 157, 1 A.K. Marsh. 157, 1818 Ky. LEXIS 8
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedApril 8, 1818
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Ky. 157 (Bank of Kentucky v. Todd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of Kentucky v. Todd, 8 Ky. 157, 1 A.K. Marsh. 157, 1818 Ky. LEXIS 8 (Ky. Ct. App. 1818).

Opinion

The Chief Justice

delivered the opinion of the court.

We are of opinion the circuit court erred in permitting the letters writen by a clerk in the bank to one of the defendants, to be read as evidence against the bank.

These letters were clearly extra-official, and not having [158]*158been writen by the orders or direction of the bank, cannot, on anJ principle, be considered as admissible evidence. ⅛

Hardin and Wickliffe for appellants, Haggin and Pope contra.

The judgment must, therefore, be reversed with'costs, anc^ ^le cause be remanded, that a new trial may be. had not inconsistent with the foregoing opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Ky. 157, 1 A.K. Marsh. 157, 1818 Ky. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-kentucky-v-todd-kyctapp-1818.