Bank of Kentucky v. Barnett

24 Ky. 499
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJune 15, 1829
StatusPublished

This text of 24 Ky. 499 (Bank of Kentucky v. Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of Kentucky v. Barnett, 24 Ky. 499 (Ky. Ct. App. 1829).

Opinion

Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Barnett would not be entitled to the privilege of paying off his note in Commonwealth’s [500]*500paper, unless he had done, or offered to do so, on the day. The notéis for dollars,and gives him the right to discharge it in bank paper, only on the condition of hjs doing it on the day it falls due. v • •

Turner, for plaintiff; Caperton, for defendant.

It is not a note for paper, nor for specie or paper, in ternatiwe. Having failed to avail himself of his privilege, Barnett now has no right to pay in paper, Wherefore the court erred in giving judgment for the yalue of the paper, * r

It is, therefore, considered by the court, that the ju^gm,ent of the circuit court be reversed, and cause, remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Ky. 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-kentucky-v-barnett-kyctapp-1829.