Bank of Geneva v. . Reynolds
33 N.Y. 160
Opinion
Held, that the General Term erred in dismissing the appeal, even though the order appealed from was clearly in the discretion of the court; inasmuch as the order was one affecting a substantial right, in effect determining the action, and preventing a judgment from which an appeal might have been taken. The order of the General Term was reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bank of Geneva v. . Reynolds, 33 N.Y. 160 (N.Y. 1865).
33 N.Y. 160 (Bank of Geneva v. . Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Kunz v. Campbell
60 N.W. 32 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)
Wright v. Coller
35 Ohio St. (N.S.) 131 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1878)
Hale v. . Clauson
60 N.Y. 339 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
Hall v. Emmons
8 Abb. Pr. 451 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1870)
King v. Platt
2 Abb. Ct. App. 527 (New York Court of Appeals, 1867)
King v. . the Mayor, Etc., of New York
36 N.Y. 182 (New York Court of Appeals, 1867)
King v. Mayor
1 Trans. App. 288 (New York Court of Appeals, 1867)