Bank of Commerce v. Hoeber

88 Mo. 37
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1885·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

Rat, J,-

In the trial court the jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, and there was judgment accordingly; from which the defendant appealed to the St. Louis coui’t of appeals, where the judgment of the circuit court was affirmed, and the defendant again appealed to this court. The case is reported in 11 Missouri Appeal Reports, 475. The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of that court. Upon examination of that opinion, the reasoning and conclusions of that court appear to be well sustained by the authorities cited. The briefs of counsel in this court furnish no sufficient reason for a reversal, and for that reason its judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of Commerce v. Hoeber, 88 Mo. 37 (Mo. 1885).

88 Mo. 37 (Bank of Commerce v. Hoeber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Guffey
59 S.W.2d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Davenport v. Burke
167 P. 481 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)
Dicks v. Andrews
64 S.E. 788 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Priddy v. MacKenzie
103 S.W. 968 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1907)
In re Chaplin
115 F. 162 (D. Massachusetts, 1902)
Powers Dry-Goods Co. v. Harlin
71 N.W. 16 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1897)
O'Brien v. Greenebaum
28 P. 214 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Richardson v. Palmer
36 Mo. App. 88 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)
Bannantine v. Cantewll
27 Mo. App. 658 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)