Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. United States

124 F.2d 187, 28 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 629, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2459
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 2, 1941·No. No. 8719·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and argument of counsel; and it appearing that the action herein is not barred by the statute of limitations; and it appearing that no fraud, malfeasance, or misrepresentation of a material fact is shown with reference to the closing agreement executed by the parties hereto m March, 1933, and such closing agreement being therefore final and conclusive, Section 606, Revenue Act of 1928, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 458: It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court, 32 F.Supp. 942, be, and it is in all things, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. United States, 124 F.2d 187, 28 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 629, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2459 (6th Cir. 1941).

124 F.2d 187 (Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Smith
146 F. Supp. 104 (N.D. Ohio, 1956)
United States v. Dickerson
101 F. Supp. 262 (E.D. Missouri, 1951)