Bank of Columbia v. Scott

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Bank of Columbia v. Scott

2 F. Cas. 645, 1 Cranch 134

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 15, 1803

StatusPublished

This text of 2 F. Cas. 645 (Bank of Columbia v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of Columbia v. Scott, 2 F. Cas. 645, 1 Cranch 134 (circtddc 1803).

Pincite

Opinion

The court will not suffer the general issue to be struck out to give the defendant leave to plead in abatement.

On the day set for trial of this cause, Mr. Caldwell [for G. Scott’s administrator] moved for leave to strike out the general issue, and file a general demurrer, on the ground that he is named in the writ and declaration, administrator generally, whereas he is administrator with the will annexed. Non allocat.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court will not suffer the general issue to be struck out to give the defendant leave to plead in abatement.

On the day set for trial of this cause, Mr. Caldwell [for G. Scott’s administrator] moved for leave to strike out the general issue, and file a general demurrer, on the ground that he is named in the writ and declaration, administrator generally, whereas he is administrator with the will annexed. Non allocat.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 F. Cas. 645, 1 Cranch 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-columbia-v-scott-circtddc-1803.