Bank of Columbia v. Ott
2 F. Cas. 644, 2 Cranch 575, 2 D.C. 575
This text of 2 F. Cas. 644 (Bank of Columbia v. Ott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bank of Columbia v. Ott, 2 F. Cas. 644, 2 Cranch 575, 2 D.C. 575 (circtddc 1825).
Opinion
after consideration, (THRUS-TON, Circuit Judge, contra,) was of opinion that the plea of “non assumpsit infra tres annos,” pleaded by the indorser of a promissory note payable sixty days after date, was bad, upon general demurrer. It ought to have been actio non accrevit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 F. Cas. 644, 2 Cranch 575, 2 D.C. 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-columbia-v-ott-circtddc-1825.