Bank of Columbia v. Ott

2 F. Cas. 644, 2 Cranch 529, 2 D.C. 529

This text of 2 F. Cas. 644 (Bank of Columbia v. Ott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of Columbia v. Ott, 2 F. Cas. 644, 2 Cranch 529, 2 D.C. 529 (circtddc 1824).

Opinion

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, contra)

decided that the plea was good, considering the titling as no part of the plea, but an indication to the clerk in what cause he is to enter the plea; overruling the case of Bank of Columbia v. Jones, [supra,] at this term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 F. Cas. 644, 2 Cranch 529, 2 D.C. 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-columbia-v-ott-circtddc-1824.