Bank of Columbia v. Moore

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Bank of Columbia v. Moore

3 D.C. 663

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedDecember 15, 1829

StatusPublished

This text of 3 D.C. 663 (Bank of Columbia v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of Columbia v. Moore, 3 D.C. 663 (circtddc 1829).

Pincite

Opinion

Which instruction the Court (Cranch, C. J., contrá,) refused to give, and the jury rendered their verdict for the plaintiffs.

The defendant’s counsel moved for a new trial, on the ground of error, in refusing the instruction; but the Court, believing that the justice of the case was with the plaintiffs, refused to grant it.

The counsel for the defendant then applied to the Chief Justice, Marshall, and obtained a writ of error to the Supreme Court, where the judgment was reversed, in 1832. (See 6 Peters, 86.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Which instruction the Court (Cranch, C. J., contrá,) refused to give, and the jury rendered their verdict for the plaintiffs.

The defendant’s counsel moved for a new trial, on the ground of error, in refusing the instruction; but the Court, believing that the justice of the case was with the plaintiffs, refused to grant it.

The counsel for the defendant then applied to the Chief Justice, Marshall, and obtained a writ of error to the Supreme Court, where the judgment was reversed, in 1832. (See 6 Peters, 86.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 D.C. 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-columbia-v-moore-circtddc-1829.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack