Bank of Columbia v. Galloway

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Bank of Columbia v. Galloway

2 F. Cas. 637, 3 Cranch 353, 3 D.C. 353

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedDecember 15, 1828

StatusPublished

This text of 2 F. Cas. 637 (Bank of Columbia v. Galloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of Columbia v. Galloway, 2 F. Cas. 637, 3 Cranch 353, 3 D.C. 353 (circtddc 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT

(nem. con.) instructed the jury, that if they should be satisfied by the evidence, that the rent was payable quarter-yearly, the plaintiffs might recover rent to the end of the quarter preceding the eviction, but not for the part of the quarter during which the eviction was. And if the rent was payable yearly, the plaintiffs could not recover in this action for the year during which the eviction occurred; and that the plaintiffs could not recover rent which accrued after their assignment of the lease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT

(nem. con.) instructed the jury, that if they should be satisfied by the evidence, that the rent was payable quarter-yearly, the plaintiffs might recover rent to the end of the quarter preceding the eviction, but not for the part of the quarter during which the eviction was. And if the rent was payable yearly, the plaintiffs could not recover in this action for the year during which the eviction occurred; and that the plaintiffs could not recover rent which accrued after their assignment of the lease.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 F. Cas. 637, 3 Cranch 353, 3 D.C. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-columbia-v-galloway-circtddc-1828.