Bank of Columbia v. Bunnel
2 F. Cas. 628, 2 Cranch 306, 2 D.C. 306
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedApril 15, 1822
StatusPublished
This text of 2 F. Cas. 628 (Bank of Columbia v. Bunnel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bank of Columbia v. Bunnel, 2 F. Cas. 628, 2 Cranch 306, 2 D.C. 306 (circtddc 1822).
Opinion
(nem. con.) decided that the fee for protest ought not to be included; and (Thruston, Circuit Judge, contra) that the attorney’s fee might be included. But, upon the bank releasing the cost of protest, THE COURT (nem. con.) refused to quash the executions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 F. Cas. 628, 2 Cranch 306, 2 D.C. 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-columbia-v-bunnel-circtddc-1822.