Bank of China v. NBM L. L. C.

545 U.S. 1138, 125 S. Ct. 2956, 162 L. Ed. 2d 886, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 5031
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 27, 2005·No. No. 03-1559·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Did the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit err when it held that civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act plaintiffs alleging mail and wire fraud as predicate acts must establish ‘reasonable reliance’ under 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c)?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of China v. NBM L. L. C., 545 U.S. 1138, 125 S. Ct. 2956, 162 L. Ed. 2d 886, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 5031 (2005).

545 U.S. 1138 (Bank of China v. NBM L. L. C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related