Bank of California v. Richardson
175 Cal. 813
This text of 175 Cal. 813 (Bank of California v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bank of California v. Richardson, 175 Cal. 813 (Cal. 1917).
Opinion
It is stipulated in this case that all of the questions involved in the appeal are identical with those involved and passed upon by this court in the case of the Bank of California v. Roberts, as Treasurer, reported in 173 Cal., commencing at page 398, [160 Pac. 255]. On the authority of that case, the judgment must be affirmed.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
175 Cal. 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-california-v-richardson-cal-1917.