Bank of Burlington v. Catlin

11 Vt. 106
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided January 15, 1839·Published

Opinion

The orator, to prove notice to the defendant, offered affidadavits to show that a copy of the bill was seasonably deliverered, by an indifferent person, to the defendant in the city of New York.

The bill was accompanied by the ordinary subpoena, which, however, contained no direction to the person delivering the copy. The court held the notice to be insufficient, and that defendant was not affected by it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of Burlington v. Catlin, 11 Vt. 106 (Vt. 1839).

11 Vt. 106 (Bank of Burlington v. Catlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.