Bank of Brookings v. Aurora Grain Co.

186 N.W. 563, 45 S.D. 113, 1922 S.D. LEXIS 11
South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided January 30, 1922·No. File No. 4698·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

WFIITING, J.

[1-4] This cause is before us -upon rehearing. ’ Our former opinion, including the dissenting views of a minority of this court, will be found reported in Bank of Brookings v. Aurora Grain Co., 43 S. D. 591, 181 N. W. 909. After further consideration of the issue presented on this appeal, the majority of the court are convinced that the views expressed in the dissenting opinion on the former hearing were in all things correct. We therefore adopt such dissenting opinion as the opin[114] ion of the court; and the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

AN'DE'RSON, J., pot sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of Brookings v. Aurora Grain Co., 186 N.W. 563, 45 S.D. 113, 1922 S.D. LEXIS 11 (S.D. 1922).

186 N.W. 563 (Bank of Brookings v. Aurora Grain Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nielsen v. Warner
281 N.W. 110 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1938)