Bank of Bethlehem v. Harris
This text of 139 S.E. 529 (Bank of Bethlehem v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrers of the Bank of Bethlehem, one of the plaintiffs in error; nor in overruling the demurrers of Georgia Farm Loan Company, another one of the plaintiffs in error. The latter company was properly made a party to the case.
2. The evidence upon the controlling issues of fact in this case was conflicting, and the court erred in directing a verdict. The issues referred to should have been 'submitted to the jury under proper instructions from the court.
Pleading, 31 Cyc. p. 470, n. 79.
Trial, 38 Cyc. p. 1568, n. 98; p. 1569, n. 6; p. 1626, n. 69, •
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 S.E. 529, 164 Ga. 655, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-bethlehem-v-harris-ga-1927.