Bank of Arkansas City v. Hasie

Supreme Court of Kansas

Bank of Arkansas City v. Hasie

74 P. 1130, 68 Kan. 806, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 435

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedDecember 12, 1903

DocketNo. 13,359

StatusPublished

This text of 74 P. 1130 (Bank of Arkansas City v. Hasie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of Arkansas City v. Hasie, 74 P. 1130, 68 Kan. 806, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 435 (kan 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This proceeding in error is based upon a transcript of the record of the district court. The certificate of the clerk is in the following form:

“I, E. F. Nelson, clerk of the district court in and for said county, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct transcript of the record in the above entitled cause, from the rendition of judgment until the overruling of the motion to revive the same, and the sustaining.of the motion to quash and set aside the service of notice thereof.”

So far as this certificate is concerned, the record of the district court may disclose proceedings subsequent to the ruling upon the motion to quash, curing any error previously made. For the want of a positive certificate that the transcript attached to the petition in error is a full, true and correct transcript of the record of the district court, the proceeding in error is dismissed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This proceeding in error is based upon a transcript of the record of the district court. The certificate of the clerk is in the following form:

“I, E. F. Nelson, clerk of the district court in and for said county, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct transcript of the record in the above entitled cause, from the rendition of judgment until the overruling of the motion to revive the same, and the sustaining.of the motion to quash and set aside the service of notice thereof.”

So far as this certificate is concerned, the record of the district court may disclose proceedings subsequent to the ruling upon the motion to quash, curing any error previously made. For the want of a positive certificate that the transcript attached to the petition in error is a full, true and correct transcript of the record of the district court, the proceeding in error is dismissed

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 P. 1130, 68 Kan. 806, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-arkansas-city-v-hasie-kan-1903.