Bank of America v. Finnemore

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Bank of America v. Finnemore

2006 ME 97, 902 A.2d 843, 2006 Me. LEXIS 100

DecidedAugust 3, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 2006 ME 97 (Bank of America v. Finnemore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of America v. Finnemore, 2006 ME 97, 902 A.2d 843, 2006 Me. LEXIS 100 (Me. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Melissa Cockerham, party-in-interest, appeals from a summary judgment entered in the District Court (Newport, MacMichael, J.) in favor of Fleet National Bank (now Bank of America, successor to Fleet National Bank) which determined that Fleet Bank’s mortgage deed took priority over her recorded civil judgment, despite her previously filed notice of lis •pendens. Because the Court is evenly divided, the judgment is affirmed.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Melissa Cockerham, party-in-interest, appeals from a summary judgment entered in the District Court (Newport, MacMichael, J.) in favor of Fleet National Bank (now Bank of America, successor to Fleet National Bank) which determined that Fleet Bank’s mortgage deed took priority over her recorded civil judgment, despite her previously filed notice of lis •pendens. Because the Court is evenly divided, the judgment is affirmed.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2006 ME 97, 902 A.2d 843, 2006 Me. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-america-v-finnemore-me-2006.