Bank of America v. Damaze
This text of 49 F. App'x 125 (Bank of America v. Damaze) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Bank of America Mortgage (BOA) appeals the district court’s order disallowing BOA’s claim that bankruptcy debtor Kenny Lawrence Damaze failed to make numerous pre-petition mortgage payments and owed BOA $19,800.40. We affirm.1
Having reviewed the record, we are not firmly convinced of error. BOA contends that the court improperly ignored the Solomon declaration, but the declaration was not part of the bank’s opposition to the relevant Damaze objection (objection to the June 15, 1999 claim). Finding that Damaze was in fact current on his payments when BOA foreclosed in 1996 is supported by the bank’s records as well as Damaze’s. BOA’s reliance on the Solomon spreadsheets is misplaced, as they do not match the bank’s actual records. Nor does Damaze’s initial indication that he was delinquent require a different result; this statement was made before Damaze had access to his complete bank records.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 F. App'x 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-america-v-damaze-ca9-2002.