Bank of America, N.A. v. Thompson

784 So. 2d 548, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6202, 2001 WL 487296
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 2001·No. No. 4D01-16·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no gross abuse of discretion in the trial court’s order granting appellee’s motion to set aside a dismissal under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b)(1). See George v. Radcliffe, 753 So.2d 573, 574-75 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). The underlying order of dismissal was entered for failure of appellee’s attorney to attend a status conference, not for any misconduct connected to the litigation.

KLEIN, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of America, N.A. v. Thompson, 784 So. 2d 548, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6202, 2001 WL 487296 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

784 So. 2d 548 (Bank of America, N.A. v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baldwin v. State
753 So. 2d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)