Bank of America, N.A. v. Peterson

782 F.3d 1049, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6233, 2015 WL 1651769
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 15, 2015
Docket12-2508
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 782 F.3d 1049 (Bank of America, N.A. v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of America, N.A. v. Peterson, 782 F.3d 1049, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6233, 2015 WL 1651769 (8th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. In Peterson v. Bank of America, N.A., — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1153, 190 L.Ed.2d 909 (2015), the Court granted a writ of certiorari, vacated this court’s judgment in Bank of America, NA. v. Peterson, 746 F.3d 357 (8th Cir.2014), and remanded the case to us for reconsidering in light of its decision in Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., - U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 790, 190 L.Ed.2d 650 (2015).

In Peterson, we relied upon our court’s decision in Keiran v. Home Capital, Inc., 720 F.3d 721 (8th Cir.2013), in holding that the Petersons’ claim for rescission under the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., was time-barred by 15 U.S.C. § 1635(f) because of their failure to file a lawsuit within three years of their *1050 transaction with Bank of America. 746 F.3d at 360. The Supreme Court held in Jesinoski that the Keiran court had erred in holding that a borrower’s failure to file a suit for rescission within three years of the transaction’s consummation extinguishes the right to rescind and bars relief. 135 S.Ct. at 792.

In light of the Court’s holding in Jesinoski, we vacate that portion of our judgment in Bank of America, N.A. v. Peterson that granted Bank of America summary judgment on the Petersons’ claim for rescission, reinstate that portion of our judgment that vacated the grant of summary judgment to Bank of America on the Petersons’ counterclaim for statutory damages, and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Larry Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
883 F.3d 1010 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)
Alan Keiran v. Home Capital, Inc.
858 F.3d 1127 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)
Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
196 F. Supp. 3d 956 (D. Minnesota, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
782 F.3d 1049, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6233, 2015 WL 1651769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-america-na-v-peterson-ca8-2015.