Bank of America, NA v. Nelson Bruce
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2461
BANK OF AMERICA, NA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NELSON L. BRUCE,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
SOUTH CAROLINA HOUSING TRUST FUND; CHARLESTON AREA CDC; SC HOUSING CORP; CAPITAL RETURN INVESTMENTS LLC; REMINISCE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:17-cv-02617-RMG)
Submitted: April 25, 2019 Decided: April 29, 2019
Before QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. *
* Judge Floyd did not participate in the consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2012). Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nelson L. Bruce, Appellant Pro Se. Shannon Troutman Sinai, ALBERTELLI LAW, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Nelson L. Bruce appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
motion seeking vacatur of the court’s prior order adopting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and remanding this foreclosure proceeding to state court. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Bank of Am., NA v. Bruce, No. 2:17-cv-02617-RMG (D.S.C.
Nov. 26, 2018). We deny Bruce’s motion to compel arbitration and for a temporary
administrative stay and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bank of America, NA v. Nelson Bruce (Bank of America, NA v. Nelson Bruce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.