Bank of America, N.A. v. Lukich

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bank of America, N.A. v. Lukich

138 So. 3d 1152, 2014 WL 2042253

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 19, 2014

DocketNo. 1D13-3105

StatusPublished

This text of 138 So. 3d 1152 (Bank of America, N.A. v. Lukich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of America, N.A. v. Lukich, 138 So. 3d 1152, 2014 WL 2042253 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court failed to provide proper notice under Rule 1.440(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, of the trial below. We therefore reverse the Order of Dismissal as to all claims of both the appellant/cross-appellee and the appellees/cross-appellants that were pending at the time the Order of Dismissal was issued. On remand, the court is directed to hold a new trial on these claims, on proper notice to all parties, in compliance with Rule 1.440(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

PADOVANO, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court failed to provide proper notice under Rule 1.440(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, of the trial below. We therefore reverse the Order of Dismissal as to all claims of both the appellant/cross-appellee and the appellees/cross-appellants that were pending at the time the Order of Dismissal was issued. On remand, the court is directed to hold a new trial on these claims, on proper notice to all parties, in compliance with Rule 1.440(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

PADOVANO, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 So. 3d 1152, 2014 WL 2042253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-america-na-v-lukich-fladistctapp-2014.