Bank of America, N.A. v. Johnson

Vermont Superior Court·Decided June 28, 2018·No. 79-5-15 Oecv·Published

Opinion

Bank of America, N.A. v. Johnson, 79-5-15 Oecv (Harris, J., June 28, 2018) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.]

STATE OF VERMONT

SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Orange Unit Docket No. 79-5-15 Oecv

Bank of America, N.A. vs. Johnson et al

ENTRY REGARDING MOTION

Count 1, Foreclosure (79-5-15 Oecv) Count 2, Foreclosure (79-5-15 Oecv) Count 3, Foreclosure (79-5-15 Oecv)

Title: Motion for Enlargement of Time (Motion 9) Filer: Bank of America, N.A. Attorney: Jeffrey J. Hardiman Filed Date: June 4, 2018

No response filed

The motions are GRANTED, but the imposition of interest to be charged to the defendant borrower, for his 12 V.S.A. section 4949(a) redemption prior to judicial sale purposes, shall be limited to the sum due with interest as of 6/15/18. These delays are not the result of any borrower conduct .

Electronically signed on June 27, 2018 at 10:05 AM pursuant to V.R.E.F. 7(d).

Michael J. Harris Superior Court Judge

Notifications:

Jeffrey J. Hardiman (ERN 4055), Attorney for Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. Defendant Angela J. Johnson Melissa A. D. Ranaldo (ERN 2630), Attorney for Defendant Dept. of Housing & Urban Dev.

vtadsbat

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of America, N.A. v. Johnson, (Vt. Ct. App. 2018).

Bank of America, N.A. v. Johnson (Bank of America, N.A. v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.