Bank of America, N.A. v. Hackbart (In Re Hackbart)

589 F. App'x 477
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedDecember 15, 2014
Docket14-13532
StatusUnpublished

This text of 589 F. App'x 477 (Bank of America, N.A. v. Hackbart (In Re Hackbart)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of America, N.A. v. Hackbart (In Re Hackbart), 589 F. App'x 477 (11th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellee Judith Hackbart is a Chapter 7 debtor. Hackbart has two mortgages on her house. The first mortgage exceeds the current market value of the house. Appellant Bank of America, N.A. holds the second mortgage. Hackbart filed a motion to void, or “strip off,” the junior lien under § 506(d) of the Bankruptcy Code. The bankruptcy court granted the motion, and the district court affirmed. We affirm the district court’s order. Folendore v. Small Bus. Admin., 862 F.2d 1537, 1540 (11th Cir.1989); McNeal v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC, 735 F.3d 1263, 1265-66 (11th Cir. 2012). Should Bank of America choose to petition this Court for en banc consideration of the issue it raises here, this panel is of the opinion that the Court should seriously consider the petition.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
589 F. App'x 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-america-na-v-hackbart-in-re-hackbart-ca11-2014.