Bank of America, N.A. v. Gaspard
This text of 137 So. 3d 1075 (Bank of America, N.A. v. Gaspard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We treat the order on appeal as an order granting a new trial and affirm because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion. See generally Brown v. Estate of Stuckey, 749 So.2d 490, 497-98 (Fla.1999) (“When reviewing the order granting a new trial, an [1076]*1076appellate court must recognize the broad discretionary authority of the trial judge and apply the reasonableness test to determine whether the trial judge committed an abuse of discretion”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 So. 3d 1075, 2014 WL 1052378, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-america-na-v-gaspard-fladistctapp-2014.