Bank of America, N.A. v. Bello (Bello)

563 F. App'x 691
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 17, 2014·No. 14-10062·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Bank of America, N.A. appeals the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order voiding a wholly unsecured second priority lien on residential property owned by a Chapter 7 debtor. The issue on appeal is whether a Chapter 7 debtor is allowed to “strip off’ a second priority lien on his home, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(a) and (d), when the first priority lien exceeds the value of the property.

We addressed recently this issue and concluded that a wholly unsecured junior lien — such as the one held here by Bank of America — is voidable under section 506(d). See McNeal v. GMAC Mortg., LLC (In re McNeal), 735 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir.2012). Bank of America acknowledges that this panel is bound by the Court’s decision in McNeal, but reserves the right to seek reconsideration of the issue by the en banc Court. Cf. United States v. Smith, 122 F.3d 1355, 1359 (11th Cir.1997) (“Under the prior panel precedent rule, we are bound by earlier panel holdings ... unless and until they are overruled en banc or by the Supreme Court.”).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of America, N.A. v. Bello (Bello), 563 F. App'x 691 (11th Cir. 2014).

563 F. App'x 691 (Bank of America, N.A. v. Bello (Bello)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Blackburn
525 B.R. 153 (N.D. Florida, 2015)