Bank of America, N.A. v. Bello (Bello)
This text of 563 F. App'x 691 (Bank of America, N.A. v. Bello (Bello)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bank of America, N.A. appeals the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order voiding a wholly unsecured second priority lien on residential property owned by a Chapter 7 debtor. The issue on appeal is whether a Chapter 7 debtor is allowed to “strip off’ a second priority lien on his home, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(a) and (d), when the first priority lien exceeds the value of the property.
We addressed recently this issue and concluded that a wholly unsecured junior lien — such as the one held here by Bank of America — is voidable under section 506(d). See McNeal v. GMAC Mortg., LLC (In re McNeal), 735 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir.2012). Bank of America acknowledges that this panel is bound by the Court’s decision in McNeal, but reserves the right to seek reconsideration of the issue by the en banc Court. Cf. United States v. Smith, 122 F.3d 1355, 1359 (11th Cir.1997) (“Under the prior panel precedent rule, we are bound by earlier panel holdings ... unless and until they are overruled en banc or by the Supreme Court.”).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
563 F. App'x 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-america-na-v-bello-bello-ca11-2014.