Bank of America, N.A. v. Agiwal
88 A.D.3d 631, 930 N.Y.2d 880
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 4, 2011
StatusPublished
This text of 88 A.D.3d 631 (Bank of America, N.A. v. Agiwal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bank of America, N.A. v. Agiwal, 88 A.D.3d 631, 930 N.Y.2d 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
Opinion
The appeal from the intermediate order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). Rivera, J.R, Balkin, Hall and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
88 A.D.3d 631, 930 N.Y.2d 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-america-na-v-agiwal-nyappdiv-2011.