Bank of Alexandria v. McCrea

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Bank of Alexandria v. McCrea

2 F. Cas. 607, 3 Cranch 649, 3 D.C. 649

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedNovember 15, 1829

StatusPublished

This text of 2 F. Cas. 607 (Bank of Alexandria v. McCrea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of Alexandria v. McCrea, 2 F. Cas. 607, 3 Cranch 649, 3 D.C. 649 (circtddc 1829).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT,

however, (nem. con.) overruled the objection; because it was not attempted to be shown that the money was paid to him; and because, if it was paid to him, and he had not credited it, he would •be liable to the defendant, or to the bank.

THE COURT also said, that they had decided at "Washington, in Bank of United States v. Wilson, [Case No. 943,] that the payment of a cheek by the bank was prima facie evidence of funds in bank to the amount •of the check.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT,

however, (nem. con.) overruled the objection; because it was not attempted to be shown that the money was paid to him; and because, if it was paid to him, and he had not credited it, he would •be liable to the defendant, or to the bank.

THE COURT also said, that they had decided at "Washington, in Bank of United States v. Wilson, [Case No. 943,] that the payment of a cheek by the bank was prima facie evidence of funds in bank to the amount •of the check.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 F. Cas. 607, 3 Cranch 649, 3 D.C. 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-alexandria-v-mccrea-circtddc-1829.