Bank of Alapaha v. Purvis

173 S.E. 103, 178 Ga. 284, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 38
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 13, 1934
DocketNo. 9720
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 173 S.E. 103 (Bank of Alapaha v. Purvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of Alapaha v. Purvis, 173 S.E. 103, 178 Ga. 284, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 38 (Ga. 1934).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. The petition as amended failed to allege ground for injunctive relief. In view of the general demurrers which the court had under consideration at the interlocutory hearing, it was erroneous to continue the restraining order, which in effect was the grant of a temporary injunction.

2. The foregoing ruling deals with a controlling question in the case and it is unnecessary to rule on the assignment of error relating to admissibility of evidence. Judgment reversed.

AU the Justices concur. E. B. Smith, for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Callan Court Co. v. Citizens & Southern National Bank
184 Ga. 87 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Kontz v. Citizens & Southern National Bank
181 S.E. 764 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Tate v. Atlanta Joint Stock Land Bank
180 S.E. 112 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 S.E. 103, 178 Ga. 284, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-alapaha-v-purvis-ga-1934.