Bank of Alapaha v. Purvis
This text of 173 S.E. 103 (Bank of Alapaha v. Purvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The petition as amended failed to allege ground for injunctive relief. In view of the general demurrers which the court had under consideration at the interlocutory hearing, it was erroneous to continue the restraining order, which in effect was the grant of a temporary injunction.
2. The foregoing ruling deals with a controlling question in the case and it is unnecessary to rule on the assignment of error relating to admissibility of evidence. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 S.E. 103, 178 Ga. 284, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-alapaha-v-purvis-ga-1934.