Banhi v. Papa John's USA, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Banhi v. Papa John's USA, Inc.

583 F. App'x 268

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 29, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1107

StatusPublished

This text of 583 F. App'x 268 (Banhi v. Papa John's USA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banhi v. Papa John's USA, Inc., 583 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roger M. Banhi appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Defendants on his civil complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Ban-hi’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Banhi v. Papa John’s USA Inc., No. 8:12-cv-00665-RWT, 2013 WL 3788573 (D.Md. Jan. 6, 2014; July 18, 2013). We grant Banhi leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roger M. Banhi appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Defendants on his civil complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Ban-hi’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Banhi v. Papa John’s USA Inc., No. 8:12-cv-00665-RWT, 2013 WL 3788573 (D.Md. Jan. 6, 2014; July 18, 2013). We grant Banhi leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

583 F. App'x 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banhi-v-papa-johns-usa-inc-ca4-2014.