Bangs v. Maxwell

2 F. Cas. 595, 3 Blatchf. 135

This text of 2 F. Cas. 595 (Bangs v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bangs v. Maxwell, 2 F. Cas. 595, 3 Blatchf. 135 (circtsdny 1853).

Opinion

BETTS, District Judge.

The law does not require the merchant appraisers to act in the presence of importers of goods, their agents, or consignees.

General allegations in a protest, that the appraisers were prejudiced, or incompetent, or not duly qualified, need not be regarded by the collector, when the particulars constituting the disqualifications charged are not set forth specifically. It is not alleged, in the protest, that the plaintiffs are not owners of the goods; nor that the owners are the producers, and not the purchasers of them; nor that the merchant appraiser was sworn by a public appraiser. Accordingly, none of those points can be now considered by the court, on the question of the misconduct of the collector in levying the duties or fees complained of.

Judgment for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 F. Cas. 595, 3 Blatchf. 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bangs-v-maxwell-circtsdny-1853.